Jorbs on his Slay the Spire stream commented problems with big data. He used a nice analogy for sampling bias. Imagine you have a swimming pool and we can’t see the bottom of it. We want to measure the average depth of it. No amount of big data will accurately estimate the depth with all the samples come from the shallow end of the pool. But if you smartly sample the pool with a grid of points, then you can come up with an accurate estimate from relatively few points. This example is nice because it can illustrate accuracy versus precision.

The analogy also funnily resembles an analogy used for Hamilitonian Monte Carlo: a puck skating around a smooth curved surface. If the pool is the posterior distribution and the depth is the negative log posterior density, then we want to explore that pool too.

Leave a comment